Selected Publications

    1. Andrzej Biłat, The correctness and relevance of the modal ontological argument, Synthese (2020), https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-02908-5.
    2. Lubacz, Józef Epistemic and poietic intentional processes. Synthese (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-021-03051-5.
    3. Li, Z., Zenker, F. Newcomb’s problem isn’t a choice dilemma. Synthese (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-03018-y
    4. Wang, B., Zenker, F. Slippery Slope Arguments in Legal Contexts: Towards Argumentative Patterns. Argumentation (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09545-9
    5. Vassallo, A. Does general relativity highlight necessary connections in nature?. Synthese (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-020-03009-z
    6. Paula Quinon, Can Church’s thesis be viewed as a Carnapian explication?, Synthese (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02286-7
    7. Gärdenfors, Peter, Quinon, Paula, Situated Counting. Rev.Phil.Psych. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-020-00508-3
    8. Yaskorska-Shah, O. Managing the Complexity of Dialogues in Context: A Data-Driven Discovery Method for Dialectical Reply Structures. Argumentation (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-020-09543-x
    9. Contemporary Polish Ontology, ed. B. Skowron, De Gruyter 2019.
    10. Marcin Koszowy, Douglas Walton (2019). Epistemic and deontic authority in the argumentum ad verecundiam. Pragmatics and Society, 10(2): 151-179. DOI: 10.1075/ps.16051.kos.
    11. Marcin Koszowy, Michał Araszkiewicz (2014). The Lvov-Warsaw School as a source of inspiration for argumentation theory. Argumentation 28(3): 283-300. DOI 10.1007/s10503-014-9321-7.
    12. Andrzej Biłat, The World as an Object of Formal Philosophy, In Contemporary Polish Ontology (pp. 87–108). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110669411-006
    13. Przedmioty wirtualne, (eds.) P. Stacewicz, B. Skowron, Oficyna Wydawnicza Politechniki Warszawskiej, Warszawa 2019.
    14. Category Theory in Physics, Mathematics, and Philosophy, (eds.) M. Kuś, B. Skowron, Springer 2019, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-30896-4
    15. Frank Zenker, Christian Dahlman, Sverker Sikström, Lena Wahlberg, Farhan Sarwar, Generalization in Legal Argumentation, Journal of Forensic Psychology Research and Practice, Pages 80-99, https://doi.org/10.1080/24732850.2019.1689782
    16. Frank Zenker, From Stories—via Arguments, Scenarios, and Cases—to Probabilities: Commentary on Floris J. Bex’s “The Hybrid Theory of Stories and Arguments Applied to the Simonshaven Case” and Bart Verheij’s “Analyzing the Simonshaven Case With and Without Probabilities, Top Cogn Sci. doi:10.1111/tops.12477
    17. Hajo Greif, Affording Illusions? Natural Information and the Problem of Misperception, Avant, Vol. X, No. 3/2019, doi: 10.26913/avant.2019.03.19.
    18. Zbigniew Król, Platonism and the Development of Mathematics. Infinity and Geometry, ISBN 978-83-7683-096-4, 2015.
    19. Roman Z. Morawski, Technoscientific Research Methodological and Ethical Aspects, De Gruyter, 978-3-11-058406-6, 2019.
    20. Bartłomiej Skowron, Tomasz Bigaj, Arkadiusz Chrudzimski, Michał Głowala, Zbigniew Król, Marek Kuś, Józef Lubacz, Rafał Urbaniak (2019). An Assessment of Contemporary Polish Ontology. In Bartłomiej Skowron (Editor), Contemporary Polish Ontology (pp. 271–294). Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter. https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110669411-015.
    21. Skowron, B., Wójtowicz, K. Throwing spatial light: on topological explanations in Gestalt psychology. Phenom Cogn Sci (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11097-020-09691-1\